Spies in
Arabia
Priya Satia, writes Spies in Arabia: The Great War and the Cultural Foundations of
Britain’s Covert Empire in the Middle East to examine the establishment of
the pre-war intelligence community in the Middle East and the eventual
establishment of Britain’s covert empire following World War I. Of particular
focus is the cultural characteristics of Edwardian intelligence agents and Britain’s
use of air control in Arabia. Satia greatly contributes to the scholarship of
British occupation in Arabia, and Spies
in Arabia is a lively and interesting work.
Satia begins by answering the
question of why Arabia was important to the British. The region provided a land
route to India where the British ruled indirectly as we read in Ideologies of the Raj by Thomas R.
Metcalf (3). Arabia also provided a place for heroic action, which took the
form of intelligence gathering. This beginning is important for our purposes
because we can better understand why the British desired a presence in Arabia
and how they overcame obstacles there. The British relied on intelligence
agents for information from the interior of a land shrouded in mystique. Due to
a weakened military force in South Africa, the rise of German power and
imperial ambition, and political rumblings inside the Ottoman Empire, it became
ever more important for the British to improve intelligence gathering methods in
the Middle East (15).
The cultural world of British agents
proved the most interesting for me to read. Satia argues that upper-class
British citizens with an eye towards literary careers found in Arabia a place
to exploit their dreams (61). The agents sought a respite from political
changes happening in Britain. In short, Arabia provided redemption from
industrial, social, and political life in Edwardian Britain (72). Satia argues that British agents’ fascination
with Arabia shaped information gathering. “Interest in Arabia flooded Edwardian
society just as that society had begun to steep itself in metaphysical enquiry”
(96). In general, the British considered Arabia as a land of myth, mystique,
and wreathed in an atmosphere of unreality (91). No other region had a biblical
past quite like Arabia and Satia surmises that that past added a sense of
otherness and mystical aura (84). Desert travel was travel back in time that
required the agents to be healthy and not dependent on the trappings of
everyday Edwardian society. Gertrude Bell believed that minimalism in the
desert was ideal for spiritual and aesthetic redemption (92). Most agents
argued for immersive travel through the Middle East to gather greater insight
into the area. They were profoundly interested in the deepest secrets of
creation while at the same time gathering information on politically- and
militarily-useful information (97). It is understandable that the romantic
years of the war and post-war offered opportunities for intelligence gatherers
to fulfill dreams of adventure and storybook ardor (80). Arabia was the natural
choice for adventure-seeking intelligence agents.
In laying the groundwork for a
covert empire, Satia explains the challenges the British intelligence agents
had as they attempted to “Orientalize” themselves while collecting information.
Despite adopting styles, habits, and mannerisms of Middle Eastern peoples, they
experienced quite a bit of trouble in their endeavors. British agents
characterized the Middle Eastern people as never telling the truth, estimating,
or otherwise being coy. Natives were also known to mix fact with mysticism. For
example, in a report submitted as intelligence by Mark Sykes, he relayed a
mythical story as told by a sheikh in response to an inquiry about agricultural
activities in the area. The sheikh went on to tell a story about two owls
falling in love and the issues they encountered. Sykes made use of the story
because it was generally believed by the agents that even the most outlandish
recounting contained some truth or useful information (100). This is just one
example of many that Satia uses to clarify for readers the difficulty agents
faced. They were left to their own devices to translate what they had gathered into
useful information. In addition, it is clear from Satia’s chapter about the
cultural world of the agents that they used the intelligence gathered as an
outlet to hone their literary skills.
If the agents had trouble gathering
information, Satia describes how perhaps the environment itself gave them more
trouble. The British agents had never before encountered a region as filled
with mysticism and history as they did in Arabia. Arabia was a land wreathed in
an atmosphere of unreality. Not only did the British have trouble surveying the
area, for a time they thought it an impossibility. Agents described the land as
infinite, immeasurable, interminable, and featureless. How could the British
map a country that was constantly blown into a new form every day? The Royal
Geographical Society admitted that Arabia was almost wholly without survey in
any scientific sense (105). I think
Satia’s treatment of how the British reacted to the land of imprecise borders,
mirage, and myth is her greatest gift to Britain’s history in Arabia.
Satia expertly weaves together the
difficulties experienced by the agents in gathering useful information and the
trouble the agents experienced with the environment. The author makes it seem
like air control was a foregone conclusion in the attempts of colonialism by
the British in Arabia. Surveillance practices and methods of coercion became
dependent on air control; this turned Arabia into an arm of the British Empire
but without outright British occupation.
Given the fact-finding issues with native
Middle Easterners and the challenges of desert life and travel, I think Satia
presents a convincing argument that the British were faced with more challenges
in Arabia than either India, Africa, or China. T.E. Lawrence is credited with being
the first to realize the need for aerial control over the region. Satia
expertly sets up the need for aerial surveys. By utilizing aircraft, agents
were able to extract truth from an essentially deceptive land (159). Air
control allowed easier communication between tribes and agents. The Royal Air
Force was able to aerially patrol Arabia from a network of bases and coordinate
information from agents on the ground in order to bombard subversive or corrupt
villages and tribes (240). Air control meant control without occupation and a
secret, covert empire.
Agents on the ground in Iraq believed that
country was especially suited to aerial surveillance. Given the nature of the
environment in Iraq, there were many landing zones, little cover to insurgents,
and the British were able to make use of far-flung bases allowed the British to
radiate power throughout the country. The British justified air control by
believing that air control was chivalrous warfare (242).
Overall what Satia is able to prove, is that
although the British began with knowledge gathering in mind, their quest
evolved into a struggle for power in Arabia. “The quest for knowledge became
entangled with a quest for power” (137). To gather knowledge, the agents simply
needed to immerse themselves in Middle Eastern culture and landscape (138). As
the war ended and the use of air control increased, the quest for power
manifest itself in the covert empire. Air control was used because the more
overt colonial rule was a political impossibility (262). The only way the
British could keep their hand in Middle Eastern matters was to rule aerially,
and thus, covertly. Satia ties this to today’s events in the Middle East where
it’s more economically and politically acceptable to control from the air
(think: the bombs recently dropped in Syria) than “boots on the ground.”
Generally, I liked this thematically organized
book. The reader’s initial impression may be of a haphazard and overwhelming
organization, but as one reads the chapters Spies
in Arabia becomes easier to comprehend. This book is not for the common
reader, nor someone with no prior knowledge of British Imperialism in the
Middle East. Satia gives few hints on what an Edwardian character was, nor does
she clarify the cultural or political differences between a consul,
intelligence gatherer, or agent.
I think there was one aspect missing from the
work, and that is the tie between aerial control and wireless technology. One
could not have been very useful to the British without the other. While Satia
does write that ground agents did not become indispensible with the rise of air
control, she never actually examines why.
Finally, the similarities between the problems
encountered with mapping the area during the British colonial project in Arabia
call to mind Google’s general problem in the same area. If you pull up Google
Street View, “Arabia” is a blank map, especially when compared to other parts
of the world. Although the reasons why are different, even today the region
still maintains an aura of mystery. Today’s society has the benefit of
high-technology satellites, drones, GPS, and imagery mapping, but “Arabia” is still
shrouded in mystery on one of the Internet’s greatest travel tools.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteYour paper is very articulate!! Good job Jaycie!
ReplyDelete